Thursday 13 February 2014

TOP TEN REASONS: JIM FETZER AND FRIENDS ARE SUNSTEIN SHILLS

Ed Noor: I do not know who wrote the following piece; I stumbled upon it and there is no home link or credit given for the author but it is relevant, most pertinent considering the events that have been going on currently with the Sandy Hook debacle. If you, the author, find this posting, please identify yourself for credit!

UPDATE: Poseidon has come forward. Please refer to his detailed comments below.
.
For the past months I have watched these debates, up close and personal, although I have not been significantly involved. I pray that posting this article should make up for my having skirted around the Sandy Hook issue for so long; once again, although it is not stated in quite these words, the folks at The Ugly Truth were correct all along in their stance on Sandy Hook. Well done, Mark, Michael, Keith, Jonathan and Mark!
.
And TY  Chris Katko for the cartoon that indirectly inspired this post!
.
Posted February 13, 2014
.
In an article Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax by Dr. Fetzer et al, the Fetzerians exhibit an uncharacteristic flash of logic with statements about "the totality of the evidence" and the probability of hypotheses. For example, "The hypothesis that confers the highest probability on the evidence is the preferable, which, when the evidence has 'settled down,' is acceptable as true in the tentative and fallible fashion of science".
.
Here are the "top ten" reasons that support the conclusion that the leading proponents of Sandy Hook hoax / no-plane 'theories' are Sunstein shills.
.
1) The Sandy Hook hoax theorists (Sandy Hookers) promote outrageous claims such as 28 deaths were faked, 20 children must pretend to be dead for the rest of their lives, some of these children attended the Super Bowl by mistake instead of playing dead, dozens or hundreds of crisis actors were hired to play the part of bereaved family members, the mass killings were merely part of a drill, and there was foreknowledge of the "drill".
Their 'evidence' consists of the opinions of some YouTube commentators who think the relatives should be shedding more tears, or shouldn't give a nervous laugh when preparing to face the cameras. Or some internet 'detectives' spot a few glitches with Google's date logs, and cite it as 'proof' that dastardly Sandy Hook conspirators slipped up and made an error that only these latter-day Sherlocks were clever enough to spot.
.
If the events at Sandy Hook were a result of government chicanery, such as an exploitation of Adam Lanza's "significant mental health issues", then the investigation has been derailed by the Sandy Hookers' mass circulation of outlandish claims about faked deaths, fake family members and a fake killer. Unsurprisingly, the fakery claims have been robustly refuted.
.
And whilst denying the abundance of evidence supporting the official Sandy Hook narrative as broadly correct, the Sandy Hookers are frequently found trying to sell other preposterous conspiracy claims such as no-planes-hit-the-World-Trade-Center, WTC-was-nuked, space-beam-weapon-zapped-WTC, and Boston-bomb-amputees-faked-injuries
.
For example, Jim Fetzer is a no-planer and claims mini-nukes demolished the WTC. Disinformation brokers such as Fetzer, Sofia Smallstorm, James Tracy, Simon Shack, Max Konrardy, Morgan Reynolds, John Lear, Dave Shayler, John Friend and Judy Wood have skills such as writing, video production, flying and spying, and at least four of them qualified as professors (as did Cass Sunstein).
One professor becoming senile and postulating crackpot hypotheses about space-based beam weapons, faked planes or faked deaths could be considered unlucky, two a coincidence, but three or four is a conspiracy.
Members of the general public who take a casual look at "conspiracy theories" will encounter the lunatic claims of these professors, and will conclude that if no-planers, mini-nukers and Sandy Hook / Boston bombings deniers are indicative of the truth movement's finest brains, then there is no need for further investigation and no need to doubt the government account of events such as 9/11.
.
Similarly, when dozens of people have skills in writing, video production, flying, spying, etc., demonstrating that they are not retards or lunatics, and these people are promoting ideas that are so at odds with the evidence that only retards or lunatics could possibly subscribe to them, then there is a contradiction that is resolved only by assuming that these people are liars who pretend to be crazy.
There is not only no evidence that no planes hit the WTC, or that the Sandy Hook deaths were "faked"; there is also no credible motive for anyone to believe such ridiculous ideas. 
.
There are, however, powerful motives for them to lie: tribal loyalty, bribery, blackmail, bullying, and a misguided belief that they are being patriotic by serving as government assets who counter "conspiracy theorists" by infiltrating truth-seeking circles and acting as if they believe the most outrageous bovine excrement.
2) A professor who is an "expert" in "critical thinking" ~ as he's been telling everyone for decades ~ should surely comprehend that it's much easier for perpetrators of false-flag terror to crash a Boeing into a building (especially with Dov Zakheim and Daniel Lewin on the team) rather than have to fake it with phony videos or invisible, inaudible aircraft capable of projecting Fetzer's postulated "sophisticated hologram[s]" to fool hundreds or thousands of eyewitnesses into imagining they saw a plane or planes crashing into the WTC, and to fool billions who would later see the footage, and planting of assorted physical evidence without anyone seeing or hearing the fakers.
.
This evidence includes a 255-pound piece of wreckage "later identified as a trailing edge flap support structure from a Boeing 767", with it needing to be wedged between an apartment building and a mosque, to be finally removed twelve years later in 2013 in a two-hour operation using a pulley system, a fuselage fragment on the roof of WTC5, landing gear at the corner of West and Rector Streets and also in an exterior panel knocked free from WTC1, aircraft parts embedded in the back of a car, and an American Airlines plane seat and life vest at the roof level of 130 Liberty Plaza (Deutsche Bank Building). And the fakers would need to create impact holes in the WTC facade matching the silhouette of a Boeing 767 by using cleverly placed shaped charges, guaranteed to detonate at the right instant. The probability of being able to blow out the correct shape is about zero.
.
.
Even if you try to imagine a "parallel world" in which Fetzer is telling the truth and the WTC planes were faked, the problem is that it requires a population that is so dumbed-down and a government that is so competent and technically proficient, that the government would be able to exploit and enslave the citizens as they pleased without having to go to all the trouble of faking planes and staging false-flag terror. 
.
Just round them up, give them some pills and put them in labour camps, they get all the water they need (as per the Guantanamo Bay prisoners), rations as long as they perform their work, and tell them it's perfectly normal and even desirable. The population would need to be so stupid as to fail to see or hear "hologram-projector" planes flying away, or fail to understand that it discredits the official story. And they would have to fail to see or hear government agents smashing aircraft debris into the back of cars or into walls or roofs, before the plane was supposed to have crashed. Or, again, fail to recognize that it is inconsistent with the government's version of events.
.
On the whole, governments ~ in our world, in this reality ~ are not supremely competent. Presidents can't always get away with relatively straightforward schemes, such as bugging their opponents. Or having sex with some woman who happens to be a co-religionist of the prime minister who arrived in Washington three days after news broke of the scandal, ostensibly for talks regarding the West Bank, but most likely trying to blackmail the president into taking part in a false-flag operation. 
.
Especially when the prime minister keeps in "close touch" with a friend and co-religionist who obtained a 99-year lease on a couple of towers and secured 12-layer, 22-company insurance coverage against terrorist attacks aggregating $3,546,809,904 "per occurrence", and including property damage and business interruption, six weeks before the buildings were destroyed in two "occurrences" of terrorist attacks. And especially when one of the target floors (94 of WTC1) has already had the "upgraded" fireproofing installed, it's due to be installed later that year on four more contiguous floors in the target zone, compatriots of the prime minister have already set up "moving companies" that operate in the states (NJ and NY) through which the fireproofing is to be transported, the prime minister has already "predicted" that "Islamist" terrorists would demolish the building, and "coincidentally" happens to be ex-Sayeret Matkal, an MIT alumnus, and lived in Denver and Jerusalem, the very same as one of the passengers on the plane that, three years later, was to fly into the building 102 minutes before it collapsed. A plane, incidentally, from which one of the so-called "hijackers" later turned up alive and well, and said his passport, had been stolen in 1995 when his Denver apartment was burgled. (And just for good measure, the woman also happens to be a co-religionist of Cass Sunstein, Gordon Duff, the late Julius Springer, and other principal players in these intrigues.)
.

Mossad agents are relatively competent, and yet Sivan Kurzberg, Oded Ellner and Yaron Shmuel let themselves get so carried away with celebrating the first plane impact that they made a spectacle of themselves high-fiving, hugging each other, flicking a lighter, and appearing "visibly happy on nearly all" of the 76 photographs that they had taken and were subsequently developed by the FBI. They knew that their co-religionists' control of the media and ability to pull strings in Washington would be their get-out-of-jail-free card.
.
The no-planes nonsense has been thoroughly debunked many times by people with professional experience in video production, and it is clear that any proponent of no-planes is either a lunatic or a liar.
.
A professor who qualified in history and philosophy of science would surely be aware that a "micro-nuke" or "mini-nuke" produces an EMP and radioactive fission products, and that it is not possible to incorporate devices into satellites that can fire "direct energy" beams with a peak power output in the order of the total power consumption of the United States. He would also be aware that when another professor makes a claim about beam weapons being used to demolish the WTC, yet doesn't even bother to do energy calculations and is easily refuted by a competent scientist, and was reportedly in a coma for six years, then her 'theories' are clearly not to be taken seriously.
When Fetzer says that he supports Judy Wood's 'research' but doesn't necessarily endorse her 'theories', Fetzer reveals his deception just as surely as if he'd given her his full backing.
The best explanation for Fetzer's behaviour is that he is a highly intelligent man who simply cannot believe that the government could be involved in massive conspiracies such as 9/11. So he remains a government loyalist, his confirmation bias, flawed epistemology and world-view leads him to imagine that all so-called "conspiracy theorists" are "goof-balls", and he believes he's being patriotic in helping the government counter the conspiracy theorists by promoting nonsensical claims about faked planes and faked deaths, effectively parodying the real patriots and truth-tellers. 
.
Since Fetzer thinks that conspiracy theorists are all a bunch of nuts, he isn't particularly concerned if his claims have not even a shred of credibility. He knows that he's helping to trash the image of those perceived by the wider audience as conspiracy theorists or "twoofers", and he thinks he's doing the right thing.
.
3) A January 2008 paper by Cass Sunstein provides an example of a recent "conspiracy theory" and contends that believers in such theories create "risks":
"...the belief [...] that the attacks of 9/11 were carried out [...] by Israel or the United States. Those who subscribe to conspiracy theories may create serious risks, including risks of violence..."
The "risks" are not to ordinary members of the public, as Sunstein would like people to believe, but to the true perpetrators of 9/11 and those involved in the cover-up, i.e., Sunstein and his pals, following an independent investigation, prosecutions, and fair trials.
.
.
According to Sunstein, the "best" way that "such theories might be undermined [...] consists of cognitive infiltration of extremist groups." Sunstein claims that "those who subscribe to such theories" do so because they have a "crippled epistemology".
Sunstein needs infiltrators who will mimic the silliest type of "conspiracy theorist" imaginable, by selectively accepting information only from the likes of John Lear, Morgan Reynolds, Judy Wood, Mike Powers / Hollingsworth and others who are part of the deception. 
 .
A higher level infiltrator (e.g. Fetzer) will build his crippled epistemology using John Lear, Morgan Reynolds, etc., as its foundation, and will use the argument from authority fallacy against his critics, e.g., "Do you consider yourself as qualified as John Lear to address these issues?" Thus, these infiltrators will act the role of an individual whose epistemology is so "crippled" that they become parodies of genuine truth-tellers.
In Sunstein's discussion of whether government should choose to ignore or rebut a "conspiracy theory", he points out that the disadvantage for the government in rebutting a particular theory is that it may "legitimate" the theory, and a theory may gain rather than lose adherents when it is perceived as sufficiently plausible that the government needs to counter it. Sunstein recommends a strategy of "rebutting many conspiracy theories" because this yields a "synergistic gain" for the government from reducing "the legitimating effect of rebutting any one of them".
.
Since Sunstein can hardly fail to be aware that Israel did 9/11, he knows that his best strategy is to introduce many new conspiracy theories, each of them with various degrees of craziness, but they all need to be crazier than the government's own 9/11 conspiracy theory of nineteen hijackers with box cutters.
Thus, Sunstein recommends a policy of countering multiple theories and "cognitive infiltration" of truth seekers, and the disinformation agents promote preposterous theories such as no-one-died-on-9/11, no-planes-hit-the-WTC, WTC-was-nuked, and no-one-died-at-Sandy-Hook.
Other agents can knock down these straw men, and will attempt to counter those who tell the facts about 9/11.
.
Theories such as no-planes and no-one-died-at-Sandy-Hook are promoted so strongly that they appear more popular than evidence-based theories about Israel's central role in 9/11. Government benefits from the "synergistic gain" obtained from not legitimating a particular theory, specifically, Israel's orchestrating of 9/11.
Third-parties (the mass audience) form the impression that "conspiracy theorists" are all a bunch of fruitcakes who think the 9/11 planes were holograms, the WTC was nuked, no children died at Sandy Hook, and "crisis actors" pretended to be bereaved family members.
4) Jim Fetzer has authored, co-authored, edited or co-edited several books concerned with epistemology and cognition. Moreover, a number of these books were published by Springer, the company founded by Julius Springer, who was a co-religionist of Cass Sunstein.
.
These include:
Sunstein needed someone to manage "cognitive infiltration designed to break up the crippled epistemology of conspiracy-minded groups". Who better than a professor whose expertise is in epistemology and cognition? Moreover, Fetzer had already been flagged as operating a "campaign of disinformation" prior to 9/11/01, and
"he told one researcher that he begins by deciding what is the truth, and then marshals evidence (selectively) to support that 'truth'."

A professor smart enough to understand epistemology, probability and the philosophical aspects of cognitive systems would not be foolish enough to imagine that a video (e.g., the infamous September Clues) that makes ridiculous, unsubstantiated claims is a more reliable source of knowledge than a plethora of evidence such as aircraft debris, eyewitnesses, photographs, video and news reports, especially when the video producer's father served as a controlled opposition Judas Goat to help counter allegations of collusion between government members and the Mafia, and whose brother's Formula One racing career was sponsored by Yeslam bin Laden. And he would know that a woman who was in a coma for six years and rambles on about space-based directed energy weapons is not a reliable source, when the energy required to vaporize (or "dustify") the steel in the Towers is hundreds of terajoules, and the "weapon" would need to sustain a power output over ten seconds in excess of the total power output of humankind.
.
He would not be foolish enough to take at face value an ex-pilot's claims about Flight 175's speed and impact being "physically impossible", especially when the claims have been proven wrong, and the ex-pilot used to fly missions for the CIA and other government agencies and discredits himself with claims about the Moon having a breathable atmosphere and "forests, meadows, lakes, rivers, people, [and] civilizations".
.
He would understand that cherry-picking of information sources, e.g., blindly believing garbage propaganda videos that are intended to deceive such as September Clues, and believing the claims of an 'ex'-CIA pilot and an 'ex'-Bush Admin member, whilst rejecting more reliable sources, will lead to crazy conclusions typical of an individual with a crippled epistemology, and that such an approach can be used to parody the wackiest type of conspiracy theorist imaginable.
Thus, Professor James H. Fetzer is ideally qualified for a leading position on Sunstein's team of cognitive infiltrators.
5) Fetzer is not an honest debater. He has a system for controlling debates on his forum when it's not going well for him ~ he bans his opponent and closes the comments!
.
As mentioned above, Fetzer's "sophisticated hologram" scenario requires invisible, inaudible plane(s) to project the "hologram-plane". One problem for the fakers is the matter of getting the correct Doppler shift for the engine roar, so that observers would hear, and amateur videos would record, the appropriate sound for the location. 
.
For example, listen to the engine roar on this video at around 04:15, seconds before Flight 175 smashes into WTC2 at approximately 590 mph. The camera is located well to the south of the Tower, and so the pitch audibly decreases as the plane passes overhead, slightly to the left of the camera. The decrease in pitch is typical of a plane passing roughly overhead. However, for an observer to the north of WTC2, the Doppler Effect would be much less. Although the angle of the plane's approach changes slightly since it's hundreds of feet overhead, it never goes from approaching to receding from the observer. See around 07:50 on the same video for an example of that. 
.
One option for the fakers would be to plant several very large, invisible loudspeakers, with inbuilt invisible amplifiers and an array of invisible batteries (or invisible cable going off to a mains power source) at various locations on the streets of Manhattan, which is of course impossible. Alternatively, the "projector-planes" would have to incorporate extremely powerful, directional loudspeakers with excellent bass extension mounted on their exterior, whilst capable of silent and invisible flight as these hypothetical planes speed away after the "hologram-plane" has supposedly crashed. All of this assumes that sophisticated hologram technology capable of fooling thousands of people is available, and was available in 2001 ~ which it isn't, and wasn't.
.
Amusingly, when Fetzer was called on this by a poster at Veterans Today named Rollo, Fetzer continued to dodge the question. After getting the last word in with ad hominems on how Rollo was obviously a "goof-ball or an op" who was "posting rubbish" (simply because he disagreed with Fetzer's no-planes lunacy), Fetzer banned Rollo from responding and closed the comments on spurious grounds that Rollo did not "even know [Fetzer's] position"!
.
6) Eyvind Hytten, the father of September Clues disinformation broker Simon Shack/Hytten, was a government asset who served as a controlled opposition, in order to counter the work of anti-Mafia crusader Danilo Dolci, who accused prominent members of the government of colluding with the Mafia. Moreover, the Formula One racing career of Simon's brother Mario Hytten was sponsored by Yeslam bin Laden.
.
Simon Hytten and his sidekick Max Konrardy aka hoi.polloi make the most outrageous claims, such as no-one-died-on-9/11. Hytten and Konrardy's lies are too crazy even for the likes of Jim Fetzer. On the one hand, Fetzer aims to appear just sufficiently wacky with his support of no-planes and mini-nukes that he can be instantly flagged as a crank by non-conspiracy-minded members of society, whilst fooling a few gullible, simple-minded people whose saving grace is that they trust the "truth movement" more than the government.
On the other hand, Fetzer does not want to appear so cuckoo that not even the shills will support him.
Thus, outsiders can become aware of the garbage 'theories' of Simon Hytten and Max Konrardy, and will reject 9/11 truth as full of paranoid lunatics who imagine that everything about 9/11 was fake. And a few in the truth movement are taken in by Fetzer and friends, thereby destroying cohesion within the group as energy is devoted to claim and counter-claim of shilling, rather than exposing the perpetrators.
.
7) The Sandy Hookers attempt to substantiate their material by citing dubious sources such as Mike "Powers" aka Mike Hollingsworth aka Entryman aka Scorpion commander aka Jsteele7707, the suspected federal informant who tried to have Charles Dyer / July4Patriot jailed on charges of attempting to blow up federal buildings, before they managed to get him jailed for 30 years for "child abuse".
.
"Powers" is touted as a so-called "professional military investigator and ballistics expert" by Fetzer & Co in Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an Elaborate Hoax, and is also cited by Alex Jones, who claims Israel could not have carried out 9/11.
.
.
8) It's already been established that Zionist operatives post on the internet under multiple aliases, sometimes attacking 9/11 truth, and at other times posting crazy conspiracy theories to make "conspiracy theorists" look nuts.
.
For example, one particular YouTuber (who at the time of writing operates the channel Oliver Terrance) posed as a dumb 16YO kid who swooned over Alex Jones (whom he described as "a very good looking man"!) and swallowed every crazy conspiracy theory under the sun: no-planes, WTC-was-nuked, directed-energy-weapons-toppled-WTC, etc. But part of the time he would attack 9/11 truth; for example, he said ae911truth are "faggots", and he would get praised by the likes of ctcole77. One of his channels was UnitedChildrenOfZion, and he also revealed his true allegiance with statements such as "Zionism will save us, shalom."
.
This was all going on prior to Sandy Hook in 2013. Then, unsurprisingly, this Oliver Terrance character came out as a staunch supporter and promoter of Sandy Hook hoax / "crisis actor" theories.
.
9) John Lear, a promoter of no-planes, is an 'ex'-CIA asset in the same manner that Osama bin Laden was an 'ex'-CIA/Zionist asset.
Lear, who has earned himself a reputation as "everyone's favorite crackpot", makes other kooky assertions, such as the Moon has "64%" of Earth's gravity, and an "atmosphere" in the craters that is dense enough to breathe in. People are well aware that "[John Lear] is a nut, which is why ATA Airlines fired him as a pilot several years ago". (Lear's story is that ATA fired him in 1989 for believing in flying saucers.) Thus, Lear further discredits himself in the eyes of "normal" people who are simply unaware of conspiracies and government crimes, and will induce that "truthers" are nuts.
But Fetzer cites this "nut" as an authority!!
.
The no-planer Dave Shayler, a transvestite who is obsessed with Kabbalah and declares himself to be the "Son of God", is an 'ex'-MI5 asset. This is another example of an 'ex'-Zionist asset who will lead ordinary people to imagine that "truthers" are lunatics and weirdoes.
.
The no-planer Morgan Reynolds is supposed to be an 'ex'-Bush Admin asset. What a "coincidence" that Lear, Shayler and Reynolds all peddle the no-planes spiel and are all supposed to be 'ex'-Zionist assets, who either retired or had some sort of falling out with their old paymasters! 
.
10) In October 2012, Gordon Duff, of Jewish descent, actually admitted that 40% of his writing was "at least purposely partially false", and that about 30% of the material on Veterans Today is "patently false".
Duff, billed as "one of the top global intelligence specialists", is the Chairman on the VT Editorial Board, and Jim Fetzer writes much of the "patently false" nonsense that may be found there.
Are they right, lunatics or liars?
.
Returning to Dr. Fetzer's principles that we should "Consider the totality of the evidence", and "The hypothesis that confers the highest probability on the evidence is the preferable", let's ask which is the preferable hypothesis:
1) That the 9/11 planes were holograms and/or eyewitnesses were paid to lie, physical evidence was faked, video and images were faked, and so on, when it would have been far simpler to crash planes into buildings with Zakheim's Flight Termination Systems. 
.
And hundreds of crisis actors were hired for Sandy Hook, children were paid or threatened to pretend to be dead and not talk about it throughout adulthood, in order that the government has a stronger case against gun control and the construction industry gets a few million dollars worth of work, when it is far simpler to wait until some lone nut with a gun goes on the rampage and not have to pay off the construction industry.
And Mike Piper, Keith Johnson and Mark Glenn are part of the conspiracy, paid to help cover up the government's subterfuge.


2) That four professors turn from brilliant academics into raving lunatics who are suffering from a "crippled epistemology" ~ including one who has co-authored and edited books and papers on epistemology, and another who specializes in media and communications.
They not only subscribe to crackpot 'theories' about faked Boeings and faked deaths, but promote the ideas with an evangelical fervour.
And others who can make videos, write, fly, spy, provide economics advice, etc., are also peddling garbage that is believable only by the certifiably insane or someone whose internet skills would amount to no more than replying, "Hello Mommy" in an e-mail.
3) That four professors along with dozens of others, all of them otherwise rational people whose confirmation bias precludes them from seriously considering evidence of government conspiracies such as Israel's central role in 9/11, agree to act the role of epistemologically-challenged conspiracy theorists, in order to help the government counter "extremist groups". 
.
The leader is selected because of his expertise in epistemology and cognitive systems. He understands how limiting his sources of information to a narrow range of crackpots such as John Lear will enable him to act the role of one of Cass Sunstein's hypothetical "conspiracy theorists" with a "crippled epistemology". Another is recruited because of his knowledge of media and communications.
CONCLUSION
It doesn't make sense that these esteemed professors should turn into lunatics and inexplicably develop a bizarre evangelical zeal to promote their crackpot theories, at the expense of making themselves look stupid, and even facing calls to resign in the case of James Tracy. 
.
It doesn't make sense that the government would hire hundreds of crisis actors, or that thousands of conspirators would fake videos and images, write CGI scripts, plant aircraft debris, pay eyewitnesses to lie, etc., when they could simply wait for some lone nut with a gun or crash planes into buildings. 
.
It does make sense that otherwise intelligent people, with an ideological blind spot that prevents them from accepting that it wasn't Osama bin Laden or Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who masterminded 9/11, would agree to help the government, probably for a fee, by cognitive infiltration of "extremist groups".
The epistemologically-blinkered shills mistakenly perceive truth-tellers as "extremists" with a "crippled epistemology".
 .
And of course, many activists know that Israel did 9/11, but are motivated by tribal loyalty to play the part of no-planes, micro-nukes, Sandy-Hook-hoax and Boston-bombings-hoax theorists.
It is not hundreds or thousands of "crisis actors" who faked deaths and faked plane crashes. It is Fetzer, Reynolds, Wood, Tracy, Hytten, Konrardy, Friend and their colleagues who are acting and faking.
Fetzer & Co are government loyalists 
who don't subscribe to any conspiracy theories.
Fetzer and his friends think that the Arabs did 9/11,
Oswald was a lone assassin,
and Israel's attack on the USS Liberty was an accident.
And they think they're being patriotic 
by operating as Sunstein shills, disinformation agents, Judas Goats, 
and by lying, faking and acting as crazed conspiracy theorists.
In reality, Fetzer & Co are traitors. 
However, in their blinkered world-view, 
Fetzer & Co imagine they're doing the right thing.
(In the case of some of these people, such as Dave Shayler and John Lear, the jury is still out. If they're not nuts, they're putting on an excellent act. And if they are nuts, how convenient! But for those such as Fetzer, the evidence is that they're too smart to believe the rubbish that they spout.)
.
When Dr. Fetzer meets up with his friends or old colleagues, he doesn't need to play the role of a crackpot whose cognitive powers are in decline, leading him to fall for preposterous hypotheses whilst developing an irresistible urge to broadcast his weird beliefs to the world. He simply tells them that his "applied philosophical research" includes his role in infiltrating "conspiracy theorists". After all, his friends and colleagues probably imagine that all "conspiracy theorists" are nuts who think the 9/11 planes and the Sandy Hook deaths were faked.
If we go back to Fetzer's pre-9/11 admission that "he begins by deciding what is the truth, and then marshals evidence (selectively) to support that 'truth'," this is exactly how their scheme works.
First they decide on a 'truth' such as no-planes or Sandy-Hook-deaths-were-all-faked. Then the low-level shills ~ e.g., CIA, MI5, or Bush Admin assets (in the case of no-planes), or hasbara trolls in the case of 'nuts' who seize on glitches in Google's Sandy Hook date stamps ~ serve as the selective sources for the high-level shills such as Fetzer, who will build their epistemologically-crippled personae with their crackpot 'theories' on the foundations of these liars and propagandists. 
.
When the media reports on James Tracy's crazy theories about Sandy Hook and the Boston bombings and he's facing calls for his resignation, he'll tell the administrators that he's acting a role for his conspiracy theories studies. Indeed, he needs to be as belligerent as possible, not even receiving a letter of reprimand until refusing for months to add a clear disclaimer at his blog to confirm that his views are not those of his university, and eventually relenting. (If they took no action against him, his legend would look even more suspect.) Given that Tracy is already on $64,650 per annum, there is no need for him to receive donations for his spare-time activities. Yet his website has a Donate button, most likely a flypaper trap that gathers the names and addresses of any patriots who are foolish enough to fall for it, for the attention of government agencies.
.
Sunstein's best strategy is to have a team of shills with wildly varying credibility, who start out relatively good and then go downhill. If they're all like Fetzer and post almost 100% bullshit, it's easy for genuine patriots and truth-seekers to identify them. 
.
This tarnishes the reputation of "conspiracy theorists" in the eyes of the mass audience (the third party), but doesn't achieve the shills' other aims of weakening morale and sowing mistrust and despondency in truth-seeking circles.
When the Zionists put a lot more investment
into establishing an initial credibility,
truth-seekers are less able to distinguish the fakes from the real patriots,
and the counter-intelligence operatives attain all of their objectives.
If the Sunstein shills were all obvious fruitcakes, it would be easy to identify them. Sunstein would love truth-tellers to think that Fetzer, Shayler, Reynolds, Lear & Co are part of their group ~ genuine, honest patriots who just happen to be crazy, rather than actors posing as crazy, honest patriots by lying and peddling bizarre claims. 
.
In general, the various shills or disinformation agents will initially present themselves as relatively sane, genuine "truth-tellers", before deteriorating into lunatics. Sunstein's strategy goes rather like this:
Each shill is assigned a Starting Stupidity Number (SSN), with 10/10 being maximum on the stupidity scale. Over the months or years, the shill will progress along the stupidity scale, in effect, regressing or degenerating. At any given time, there are plenty of "sleepers", ready to degenerate when the time is right.
For example, Jim Fetzer started at 8/10, based on how he would "accidentally" plump for the craziest WTC demolition scenarios such as nukes or space beam weapons, when other, far more reasonable scenarios were being advanced. 
.
People with limited common sense and an aversion to science might have been fooled into thinking that maybe the government had developed a new, special type of small nuclear device, capable of reliable, timely, controlled detonation whilst leaving no radioactive signature. 
.
.
Fetzer progressed to 9/10 as he became a keen no-planer, posting drivel about a Boeing 767 being rather like a "flying empty beer can". He would cite those such as 'ex'-CIA asset John Lear as an "expert" who would back his claim that a Boeing 767 flying at approximately 590 mph whilst 1,000 feet above sea level was "physically impossible". Lear, as a well-known crackpot who not only supports no-planes but believes the moon to be inhabitable with a breathable atmosphere in the craters, clearly had an SSN of 10/10.
.
Simon Hytten/Shack and Max Konrardy/hoi.polloi would have been assigned an SSN of 9/10, based on their peddling of no-planes propaganda. They later progressed to a stupidity factor of 10/10 with their "vicsims" imbecility, which claims that all 9/11 victims were faked.
.
Sofia Smallstorm began with a very low SSN on the basis of her 9/11 Mysteries video, which was reasonably good, but is now 9/10 or thereabouts after showing her true colors with a deceptive Sandy Hooker propaganda video and fully aligning with Fetzer and the rest of the disinformation gang. 
.
Eric Hufschmid's SSN was also quite low; he started out with a book and video shortly after 9/11. His stupidity rating soon rocketed to 10/10 after he claimed people such as Ernst Zundel and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad were secretly working for the Zionists. As Hufschmid became an increasing irrelevance, he posted naked rear-view pictures of himself on his website. We can only hope that Smallstorm doesn't follow Hufschmid's example!
 .
John Friend was installed as the token "white supremacist", whose criticisms of organized Jewry would initially win him the confidence of some patriots and qualify him for a fairly low SSN. After aligning himself with Fetzer and becoming a no-planer and Sandy Hook denier, Friend advanced to 9/10 on the stupidity scale. The ADL was readily able to denounce him as an "anti-Semite" with "extreme views", and he serves as a brilliant example for whenever they want to portray Judaism's critics as racist lunatics. As early as August 2012, Friend purportedly received a threatening e-mail from the JDL. Since Friend is not stupid enough to believe in no-planes, he must be working for Cass Sunstein, the JDL, ADL or a similar organization. Most likely the JDL, since they could then 'threaten' him in order to help establish his legend, or "cred building", as a wise commentator said.
.
It is quite rare for a shill to be assigned an SSN of 10/10, but it does happen. According to Dimitri Khalezov, each Tower was demolished by a 150 kiloton thermonuclear bomb that had been placed 50 meters (164 feet) below the foundations when the Towers were built. Khalezov claimed the government (i.e., the Nixon Admin) was in on the plan, kept it a secret (i.e., successfully prevented Washington Post or New York Times reporters from uncovering the scheme), yet Soviet agents such as Khalezov became aware of it. And Khalezov stated that, although the planes that crashed into the Towers were really fake planes, New York officials believed them to be real. And because the plane that hit the Pentagon was really a cruise missile, and because officials had determined that it had an unexploded nuclear warhead, the New York officials feared that the "planes" that crashed into the Towers were also carrying unexploded nuclear warheads. And in order to save New York City from possible atmospheric nuclear explosions, the City officials decided to detonate the 150 kt thermonuclear devices that were buried beneath the Towers. Khalezov didn't explain why WTC7 was pulled. See here for more on Khalezov's particular brand of idiocy.
.
At any given time, a shill may "expose" other shills who are higher on the stupidity scale. So Fetzer exposes Hytten/Shack and his cronies, whose "vicsims" baloney made them a clear 10/10. Once a shill reaches 10/10, they can do just about anything. Hytten has called Fetzer a shill.
.
In the same way that government derives a synergistic gain from "rebutting many conspiracy theories", sincere truth-seekers can avoid legitimizing one or two of the most obvious disinformation brokers by rebutting many of them.
However, it is now time for these shills to be sidelined, ignored, and recognized for what they are: government stooges, traitors and liars, for whom there can be no place in any truth or patriot movement.

15 comments:

  1. What a hit piece... that establishes what, exactly? That MG and friends are the good guys and Fetzer is the bad guy?

    If I could erase Fetzer, Johnson, Piper, MG and all these egotistical maniacs from the equation and simply focused on the vast amount of discrepancies, twists, lies and crazy behavior of key characters in the Sandy Hook deal, I still come away seeing a bogus official story.

    And what appears to be happening is a group of people are defending the official story while I want answers to facts that make the official story an obvious hoax. Are all of Fetzers measly 10 questions ever attended to. What about the hundreds more questions?

    To see these people attack the others but never fully address the discrepancies does nothing but draw attention to them, and causes me to question their motives.

    I have no love for Fetzer. I don't care much for MG (for other reasons) and have no real opinion of the others except for how I had the one and only bad interaction at Johnson's blog. I have always respected Piper's books and research, but in this area, he has obviously not done his homework.

    When it comes to the "debates", Piper was wholly unprepared and disappointing. Johnson had a few pertinent issues (I think one was addressed above), but on the whole was also unprepared. It was if neither had even read the Fetzer paper or followed much of any of the other researchers', bloggers', videographers' work, either.

    Fetzer only scratches the surface of my own mountain of questions regarding SH. But at least he IS questioning, much unlike the others in this saga. That, right there, is dubious.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Totally agree with what Buelahman has to say. I have a good idea why and who might repeat almost verbatim the terrible, repudiative points Piper tried to make in the debate and not want to take claim for writing this garbage. For anyone to agree with Piper and companies sloop makes me question if they are legit. I try to be open minded and look at both sides arguments, but unfortunately it was a one sided debate. When two people debate they should support their argument and that only Fetzer did that and clear made the others look the fools that they indeed are. Rachel

    ReplyDelete
  3. Firstly, many thanks to Noor for reposting my piece on Fetzer and friends, and adding illustrations.

    Let's consider the various alternatives regarding the status of Buelahman and Anonymous / Rachel, in order of descending probability.

    1) They are Sunstein shills or hasbara trolls. Their comments are totally consistent with that. There is no way that they can, or ever will be able to, refute my evidence-backed argument and logic, and so they must employ an alternative spin strategy. They pretend to be unbiased observers who have been duped by Fetzer's lunatic claim that no children died at Sandy Hook. "Duh, I look at both sides of the argument, I don't like Fetzer much and I've always respected Piper's books and research, and I have no evidence, but this time Fetzer is right and Piper is wrong."

    Buelahman, a self-described "redneck", claims here to have "no love for Fetzer", yet is eagerly supporting him at every opportunity, not only vis-à-vis his Sandy-Hook-hoax claims, but also his JFK 'work'. E.g., "B’Man’s Note: You can gain a lot of insight into the JFK murder by listening to James Fetzer".

    Buelahman claims the Boston bombings were faked and those who lost their legs were amputee actors (a baseless claim that is truly sick.) Of course, any hasbara troll posing as a dumb "redneck" and crazy "conspiracy theorist", who alleges Boston bombings amputee victims were actors, is going to do all they can to support Fetzer. They are all working for the Zionists, and all share the same goal in seeking to portray truth-seekers as lunatics and dumb rednecks!

    Not that it should even be necessary for anyone with an iota of common sense, but the Boston bombings amputee actors 'theory' is debunked here:

    http://www.sott.net/article/262361-Why-there-were-no-actors-at-the-Boston-Marathon-bombings

    Every time some clown alleges that victims were acting or faked their injuries, the truth movement is damaged. There is only one winner: the lie movement, comprised of Jews and other government assets.

    Seung-Hui Cho murdered 32 at Virginia Tech in 2007, and didn't even have a rifle. Since the Sandy Hook massacre, there have been another 44 school shootings that claimed 28 lives. Last Saturday, Virginia Tech student Samanata Shrestha was killed. Were these all "hoaxes" too? And if Virginia Tech wasn't a hoax, how interesting that the Sandy Hook "hoax" allegations came after Sunstein's Conspiracy Theories paper was published!

    Rather than refute any of my points or provide any evidence for their own position, they just assert that Fetzer is right to promote (absurdities such as) no-planes, Judy Wood's 'research', and Sandy-Hook-deaths-were-faked. The Sandy Hookers have had 14 months, so why have they still not come up with any evidence to support their wild claims of "crisis actors", children playing dead and going to the Super Bowl by mistake, etc.? And if they think Fetzer hasn't done a good enough job with his Top Ten Reasons piece, why not write their own article with their "hundreds more questions"? Why not publish?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for identifying yourself Poseiden. It felt strange posting without a credit given! I just wish this whole thing would just go away! Your attempts at summation and closure were helpful from my limited perspective. When you think of the amount of cognitive dissonance we are exposed to on a moment by moment basis, it really is easy to lose focus and direction ~ such is the war aimed on the alternative consciousness of the planet.

      However, I do have to mention here at the moment I can assure you Beulahman is no agent of any type ~ at least not the last time I looked. No he is a sincere person with his own take on things but not a newbie or an agent. I cannot speak for Rachel simply because I do not know her.

      Delete
  4. 2) Buelahman and Anonymous are newcomers to the truth scene, are not familiar with the various players, and haven't had time to determine who is lying to them. Hint: It shouldn't take long to figure out the truth. Compare the claims of each person, and see if you think it makes sense that the 9/11 perps would smash aircraft debris into cars and walls, plant it on roofs, place charges in the facade of WTC1 and 2 hoping to blow out the silhouette of a Boeing 767, use "hologram projector planes", and hope that no one would see or hear the planes speed away or the government agents smashing aircraft parts into place, before the agents got hold of all the amateur videos to edit the sound whenever the Doppler shift was not right.

    Or does it make more sense that they would use Dov Zakheim's "Flight Termination Systems" to hijack the planes electronically, and have Daniel Lewin on Flight 11, the guy who "loved jumping out of planes" and was an ex-Sayeret Matkal Captain, ex-MIT, and lived in Denver and Jerusalem, making it extremely unlikely that he didn't know Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister who had also been a Sayeret Matkal Captain, was ex-MIT, lived in Denver and Jerusalem, kept in close touch with Larry Silverstein, said 9/11 was "very good" for Israel, "predicted" the destruction of the WTC in 1995, is the son of Jabotinsky's chief aide, has a father-in-law who served in the Irgun, celebrated the King David Hotel bombing on its 60th anniversary, was in London on the morning of 7/7 and had advance knowledge of the bombings, gained a BSc in architecture that, together with blueprints obtained from co-religionists Larry Silverstein or Lewis Eisenberg, allowed him to calculate that taking out five contiguous WTC floors would place enough core columns over the critical slenderness ratio such that Euler buckling and global collapse would ensue, was prime minister of a state with a history of false-flag terror, and was a compatriot and co-religionist of the three guys who were seen high-fiving, hugging each other, flicking a lighter and smiling on the roof of an Urban Moving Systems van at 100 Manhattan Avenue, Union City before the news of the first plane impact had broken on WINS 1010, and who later admitted that they'd gone there because it provided "a view of the entire length of both towers" - before the South Tower was hit! And were found on 9/11/01 to be in possession of "airline tickets with immediate travel dates for destinations world-wide". And worked for a "moving company" whose owner closed the company and told his workers they were fired at lunch time on 9/11/01 (before any of the Israelis were arrested), and whose mother-in-law made a transaction on a Florida property on the Friday before 9/11/01, consistent with foreknowledge that the family might have to flee the country in the next week. Etc.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 2) (cont.) Did the Sandy Hook conspirators create Andrew Wheeler's website's domain in April 2003, then post about him on internet forums - e.g., in 2009, and obtain a photograph of a person to use on his website, in order to create a realistic-looking online presence for a fictitious person, and then trick or persuade various newspapers into using another photo of the same person in reports stating that he traveled to Connecticut in December 2012, all so they could have a fake "uncle" of a fake "victim" for their Sandy Hook "hoax" and "false-flag" that they planned to stage nearly ten years after setting up "Wheeler's" website? Or did they hire a "crisis actor" to pretend to be him, hope that the real Andrew Wheeler didn't find out, and have someone standing by in Hawaii ready to shoot him before he talked? Isn't it more realistic to admit that Lanza was simply a lone nut with serious mental health issues who told his mother he would not feel bad if anything happened to her, and had handguns and a rifle, a video game called "School Shooting", a video depicting children being shot and the killer pointing a handgun at his head, and an obsession with mass killings such as the Columbine massacre? (Hint: Try looking up Occam's Razor. :-)

    You should derive the conclusion from the evidence, not start with a 'truth' and then cherry-pick evidence - much of it originating from Zionist assets - to fit that preselected 'truth'.

    If Fetzer can't even figure out 9/11 after twelve years, and his 'research' leads him to spout bullshit about faked planes and nukes, how in hell can he be expected to understand what happened at Sandy Hook? And if Buelahman and Anonymous are trying to decide who is right, why not look at who admitted, even before 9/11, that he starts with the conclusion and then tries to cherry-pick 'evidence' to support that conclusion? And who had been flagged as conducting a "campaign of disinformation", even prior to 9/11?

    There are those who make outrageous claims such as Boston-bombings-amputee-victims-were-actors, and there are those who do their best to tell the truth. It shouldn't be that hard to work out who is lying in the "truth movement".

    3) Buelahman and Anonymous are a couple of kids or retards, who will probably never be smart enough to understand 9/11 and Zionist intrigues. In that case, they still have every right to post their opinions. But be warned - you're only making yourselves look silly, and it's better to leave the analyses and thinking to those who are capable of it. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Notice how this person uses attacks immediately... including accusations of all sorts.

    Look how this person has clogged up the comment section with those assaults, accusations and character assassination.

    I don't trust this kind of person in the slightest. Too slimy. Obviously has an agenda.

    It is this kind of hogwash that pushes me towards believing Fetzer and Co are on to something and this person is trying to stop it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Gosh,

    This poseidon character has a very large ego with little to support his sefl-glorification..

    Check the Alexa ratings for his blog then compare to my blog... you know, since I am a newbie and shill for Cass Sunstein. I get almost twice the hits on my shitty little blog, which means yours is even shittier. Hmmm.

    I am basically asking for someone, even this sayanim Poseidon, to give some sort of breakdown of the many anomalies that are present (whether or not Fetzer, Smallstorm or anyone else has brought them to our attention) and explain them to us where we might understand the discrepancy... where we might get an understanding internally. Maybe this shlemiel could analyze Wolfgang Halbig's commentary and show us what a Sunsteinite he is, too.

    This person, nor Johnson, nor Piper, nor Spingola's latest show addressing the Smallstorm presentation (and I am one of Spingola's biggest fans)... NO ONE has done that. They all are basically doing what this numnut is doing and is attacking character without addressing the issues.

    He did it within the first paragraph addressing me, then spent several more paragraphs stabbing the dagger of misdirection and character assault even more.

    This is exactly what I witnessed Piper and Johnson do in the "debates".

    Well, it is obvious that these people are desperate in trying to force this view on others, but their only recourse is to attack the opposition because thus far their arguments have FAILED almost totally.

    At the very least, Fetzer has been able to list the facts (over and over and over) where the opposition just calls him a Sunstein minion and skirts two or three issues, believing that their listeners (and sycophantic followers) will "just believe".

    They sound just like 911 official story purveyors.

    Yeah, Poseidon, you and your blog are top notch.

    snicker.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Buelahman is absolutely right in that I do have an agenda. It's steering people towards the truth about the deceptions and machinations of the powers-that-be.

    As for trusting, again, there is no reason to trust some anonymous commentator with a website, whom you have never met. That's why I back up my arguments with references to mainstream sources. For example, we know that the Pentagon's accounts section was targeted on 9/11. The report says: "One Army office in the Pentagon lost 34 of its 65 employees in the attack. Most of those killed in the office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts."

    We also know that in March 2000, it was announced that the Pentagon's accounts were in such disarray that almost $7 trillion of "corrections" had been necessary to balance the books, with $2.3 trillion of those lacking receipts. Bush nominated Rabbi Dov Zakheim as Pentagon Comptroller and CFO in February 2001; he was sworn in on May 4 and said he would be making some changes. He had power to hire and fire those who did data backups.

    In 1999 Zakheim was CEO of SPC International, who made world-class "Flight Termination Systems". An FTS was a "fully redundant system capable of controlling the termination of airborne test vehicles" and used by customers for "terminating tests of both recoverable and non-recoverable systems. Primary operators can be located up to several hundreds of miles away from the site of test termination." Zakheim was co-signatory of the September 2000 PNAC paper that called for a "new Pearl Harbor". At a breakfast meeting in the Pentagon just before the first plane hit WTC1, Rumsfeld predicted that some kind of "shocking" world event would occur in the near future.

    When the first plane hit WTC1, in an extraordinary "coincidence" it banked at a 25° angle so that the impact zone covered five floors - the very same five contiguous floors (94-98) that not only had upgraded fireproofing installed between 1996 and 1998, but the fireproofing on those floors had a high density compared to that on the other upgraded floors. In other bizarre "coincidences", the NRO was running an exercise involving a plane crashing into a tower commencing at 9:00 on 9/11/01, two of those listed as killed on Flight 77 had worked on "deep-black" projects, Silverstein and his children didn't turn up for work on 9/11, and Silverstein was a close friend of the then ex-prime minister of a state with a history of staging false-flag terror, whose nationals were seen celebrating before the first plane crash was even announced on the local AM news radio station.

    See: http://www.takeourworldback.com/911whodunit.htm

    or: http://www.takeourworldback.com/911perpstimeline.htm

    When you take the false, government-backed conspiracy theory, there is a string of highly improbable "coincidences". When you "connect the dots" and formulate the correct hypothesis, these "coincidences" resolve into expected events that are part of the causal chain.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Apart from all roads leading to Israel, Zionists are behind the cover-up and COINTELPRO.

    On September 13, 2001, Don Radlauer of the Interdisciplinary Center at Herzliya published a report suggesting that hijacking and steering Boeings would have been an easy task. On April 30, 2002, Silverstein's "structural engineer" Matthys Levy claimed that office fires could melt steel, although he admitted it looked like a "controlled demolition". On April 9, 2004, Eddie Guigui Shalev, an Israeli national who served in the IDF's paratroops regiment, claimed that Hani Hanjour was a "good" pilot. James Murdoch's brother-in-law was set up in 2002 and helped with a book and video so he could be instaled as a "truth-teller", before degenerating into a classical COINTELPRO operative who claimed almost everyone in the movement was a Zionist agent. More recently, Sunstein has recommended "cognitive infiltration" and we have the same pattern with Sofia Smallstorm, who was initially selected on the basis of her excellent speaking voice for video narration, and was then instructed to degenerate into pushing garbage 'theories' such as Sandy-Hook-was-a-hoax.

    There is no denying that the Sandy Hookers and Boston Bonkers, who try to peddle crazy theories that are anathema and offensive to anyone with any common sense, are damaging the truth movement. This is exactly what Sunstein planned, so that those who tell the truth about 9/11 are perceived as being part of the group of crazy people who think Adam Lanza didn't exist and Boston victims were "amputee actors". It's revealing that the agents never tell the facts about 9/11, but keep pushing the lunatic 'theories' such as no-planes and amputee-actors.

    If they sincerely want to help the truth movement, anyone who has just got dragged into the Sandy Hook / Boston Bombings nonsense by mistake should quit promoting that, and go over to responsible researching and providing the facts about major events like 9/11. People will reveal themselves as agents if they continue to do their best to damage the movement, by posing as crazy conspiracy theorists and promoting speculative nonsense, such as Adam Lanza didn't exist, the classmates who spoke about him were all bribed, and others didn't speak out because they'd been threatened. Look at the risk / reward for the perps - why have thousands of people in a conspiracy that makes a few million bucks for the construction industry?

    On the other hand, when the perps stand to swindle $ hundreds of billions from the Pentagon and have other nations eventually spending in excess of $1 trillion fighting wars for the benefit of Israel, that restores Mossad and CIA Afghan opium profits after the Taliban banned its production in the summer of 2000, and the operatives are mostly highly trained Mossad and part of a tightly-knit racial group whose leaders have an agenda of world domination, and they control the mass media and have enough political influence that they can recommend a policy of "cognitive infiltration", they will go for it. That's if they have no conscience, or the junior operatives are tricked into imagining they're doing it to save Jews from another "Holocaust".

    Fetzer certainly is onto something - the salary he receives from Sunstein as a senior member of the team who pose as epistemologically-challenged conspiracy nuts.

    Sorry for "flooding the comments", but there's a lot to be said. We should counter Sunstein shills who "introduce some cognitive diversity" in the form of crazy conspiracy theories designed to damage the truth movement, and help the pursuit of truth by collating facts and information about real conspiracies. That's my motives or "agenda".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Poseidon, Keith Johnson has been trying to find a way to contact you. He can find no email for you on your site either. Can you remedy this in one way or another?

      Delete
    2. Hi, Noor. I sent some info to Mike Piper yesterday, and he CC'd to others including Keith. So Keith should have my email address. If he doesn't contact me soon, I'll contact him.

      Delete
  10. I've updated my page on Fetzer and friends to include new information on Wolfgang Halbig, who is hoping to raise "a lot" of money from the Sandy Hookers.

    http://www.takeourworldback.com/fetzersunstein.htm#halbig

    It turns out that Halbig is Jewish, and on July 24, 2012 was trying to solicit money on a pretext that it would be used to save children from committing suicide, and he would "probably" pay it back later.

    "Please donate and investigate what we can do in saving children from committing suicide. I need $100,000 thousand dollars [sic] and probably pay it back once the company is up and running. wolfgang"

    In September 2012, he posted "OBAM HATES THE JEWS AND DOES NOT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THAT JERUSALEM IS THE CAPITAL" and "What is it going to take for the uneducated Americans to get educated and start thinking about how they have responsibilities and not just rights that they throw in our faces everyday" and "To this day I cannot believe that someone did not kill [Hitler] which would have saved 6 million of our people there not just a jewish race they are people just like you and me."

    On October 10, 2012, Wolfgang W. Halbig posted a bizarre conspiracy theory about how he'd been "gathering information about and evidence against Barack Hussein Obama, I have encountered hundreds of coincidences that strike me as amazing...." It was a very lengthy piece, which he copied and pasted multiple times.

    When he posted another weird 'theory' about Obama in the same month, it provoked responses such as "The paranoia and racism run deep in this one", "Sir you sound like a conspiracy theorist!! You have too much time on your hands.", "Wow....real KKK marerial. [sic] Reminds me of the John Birchers back in the 60's. True Tea Party material."

    On March 23, 2012, Halbig was clearly trolling, telling someone: "Your an idiot..........get a life.. How wrong can anyone be. You need mental health counseling if that is how you feel".

    This is all consistent with someone who was working for Sunstein by inserting various "conspiracy theories" so they could monitor how people responded. And it all happened before Sandy Hook. Now, it looks like these operatives, whether Jewish or simply sociopaths, are exploiting the Sandy Hook event to make truth-tellers look nuts, to monitor how "conspiracy theories" spread, and to harvest personal details (and, in the case of Halbig, trick into sending money) of genuine truth-seekers.

    So Wolfgang Halbig isn't simply a school safety expert who thought there was something amiss about Sandy Hook. Months before Sandy Hook, he was inserting bizarre, convoluted conspiracy theories, trolling, trying to garner sympathy for the Jews, and attempting to get people to send him money. And now he hopes to get Sandy Hook truth-seekers to send him their money.

    His frequent postings about an "uneducated" social class, and his reference to "uneducated" Americans, provides some insight into how he really perceives those he is targeting with his latest scam.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anyone is free to judge for him/herself whether ANY of the alleged 9/11 victims were real. Linked below are two articles of mine which any open-minded person is free to read. In later years, we have seen how most "terror attacks" peddled by the media corporations are nothing but fear-mongering propaganda. Why would 9/11 (the greatest / silliest media hoax of our times) have been any different?

    THE 9/11 MEMORIAL SCAMS
    http://septemberclues.info/vicsims_photo-analyses.shtml

    DECONSTRUCTING 9/11
    http://septemberclues.info/deconstructing.shtml

    ReplyDelete
  12. The black background makes this site unreadable. That's a shame.

    ReplyDelete

If your comment is not posted, it was deemed offensive.